Win my Vote

I’ll be honest, my typical political ramblings tend to be on a global/federal perspective. I’ve certainly been accused of being a Bush/Harper basher. I love Jon Stewart’s political satire and I regularly read alternet. Having said that, I find it’s easy to be a Bush basher, easier to jump on those political bandwagons, than discussing what is happening in our local scene. That’s because at this level, the lines are a lot blurrier, the issues more personal perhaps. So with that in mind, I’m more of a blank slate with this upcoming NB election. My opinions less formed.

So I’m finally going to write a post about the upcoming NB election. I think it’s important to clarify that I’m just a regular potential voter. I’m not a political expert, I only semi follow it in the news and mostly when issues that are important to me pop up and as I’ve said before, for the most part, I feel that trying to figure out who to vote for is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. What I do have are my observations of the election in a peripheral sense. In other words, Mr. Lord, Mr. Graham and Ms. Brewer, I’m your regular every day voter that your marketing campaign needs to appeal to. Here’s your demographic info:

single 37 year old Mother of two young children, one in school, one in preschool
Fredericton
Employed
income range (hey this is a public blog, c’mon;))
Post Secondary Education
Home Owner

What I’m curious to know and I know I could search and find it, but maybe a reader will have the info for me. What percentage of women vote in NB? How much of the female vote influences the polls here?

The reason I ask is that I’m going to blog about my perceptions of their marketing campaign. After all, they’re trying to gain my vote. I’m the one they need to sway. I read both the gleaner and the TJ yesterday and saw the full page campaign ads. With my new job, I’ve spent the last year investing a lot of time looking at marketing to women (I highly recommend. Marketing to Women and Don’t Think Pink) I saw both ads from a different perspective.

Liberal Ad:
1/2 page black and white (except for the liberal logo in red)
3rd person copy
team imagery

PC Ad:
full page ad, full colour
1st person copy
Close up of Lord 

Graham’s ad showed he and his team walking together. You can see the same imagery on his website. It’s a bit reminiscent of The Right Stuff but it works to a point. I think the colour version works better than the b/w ad in the paper. It’s too busy and loses it’s effectiveness of it being a team or community in b/w. Women are drawn to imagery that either connotates a team or community feel or they are drawn to imagery that shows close ups of people’s faces. The PC ad with Lord is certainly noticeable, but I find it’s too much in your face and not an appealing photo (no offense Mr. Lord;)). They both took different approaches with their copy as well. Graham’s copy is 3rd person (from the team) is specific in relation to energy, that the “PC’s have wasted 2.2 billion on the Orimulsion fiasco.” Which by the way most women are not receptive to that form of competitive put-down marketing.  He engages in “report talk” rather than “rapport talk” The PC Ad does a better attempt with the rapport talk as he uses the first person voice, the only problem, is that it’s too vague. The PC headline “Getting results for our children, families and seniors.” catches my attention, fits my demographic. The Liberal headline “Shawn Graham will make New Brunswick an energy leader”, yes it has my attention too, as certainly energy is important and definitely one of my “causes” but as the main leading headline, not as effective as the PC ad in that the PC ad hit on children and families, my critical focus for me.

So visually overall, I think the PC ad is more effective (although I think using a different image would have been better). In fact if you took the imagery (community/team feeling works) from the Liberal ad, combined it with the feel of the copy from the PC Ad. Keep the third person “we”, but give it a more personal touch, provide some facts and stay away from the competitive put-downs. Then I think it would have been a very effective ad. And yes colour ads are more effective, although more costly as well.

So what does this mean bottom line. I think it means that more people will be drawn visually to the PC ad then the Liberal ad regardless of where their loyalties lie.

And maybe I missed it (and if I did, that says something too about it’s effectiveness of reach), but was there an NDP ad?

So how much of a difference does an ad make? How much of a difference overall to their campaign will it matter which ad or marketing campaign, I prefer more? Will their signage that is just starting to be distributed all over town make a difference? How much do I trust the print media in NB which is essentially Irving owned? (another issue altogether). How does the every day person find out the election facts or will old engrained, pre-conceived and yes quite possibly false and ill informed info be my deciding factor. How much does my vote count? Who’s going to win my vote?

9 Responses to Win my Vote »»


Comments

  1. Comment by Scott | 2006/08/21 at 01:33:09

    The PC ad with Lord is certainly noticeable, but I find it’s too much in your face and not an appealing photo (no offense Mr. Lord;)).

    I’ll bet you a night out on the b-ball floor that a two bit local marketing firm came up w/t research and data that said that if it is about leadership you want to show a closeup with the leaders mug. In other words, if you want to gain peoples trust and confidence in a short election where there is limited time to converse w/t voters, than this is the next best thing.

  2. Comment by Lisa R | 2006/08/21 at 08:02:32

    I’m sure you’re right Scott (although we can still hit the bball court;)) The problem with it though is that Lord and Graham are essentially branded. So much so, that we’re left with impressions of who they are, rather than what they represent with their party. Personally I think it’s a mistake. The average every day person retains impressions of Graham and Lord from the media and when we see a close up of their mug, it revives all associations with it. I suspect the Liberal party will try not to have Graham be the brand for the liberal party (and their first ad suggests this), but all politicians, just as any good company knows, that marketing happens all the time and not just during the “big campaign”, so I think it may be hard for the Liberal party to remove Graham’s branding from it. And it’s obvious from the PC website and their ads, that they are going the complete opposite direction with Lord. So if Lord has enough of a positive impression with NB’ers then, his close up photos may re-inforce that trust and confidence in the people, but if they’ve already got a bad taste in their mouth about him, then it just repels them even more. It’s just my opinion and I’m not an expert by far, but I think it’s a gamble.

  3. Comment by Spinks | 2006/08/21 at 10:48:28

    You go girl. The Liberals could use your savvy in their campaign. You really have to wonder if they test market this stuff or just show it to like-minded individuals who say “I love it.”

    BTW, I’m on your team for b-ball. We’ll mop the floor with Scott. He’s still recovering from a bike mishap.

  4. Comment by Politicsnb | 2006/08/21 at 22:24:41

    Intresting observations Lisa. As Spinks said, the Libs should have hired you….lol

    Looking forward to hearing to what you have to say as the campaign goes along. The fact you are not a “pro” at politics as you put it, simply makes it that much more intresting.

    Keep it coming.

    Regards
    PNB

  5. Comment by Lisa R | 2006/08/21 at 22:36:16

    Thanks for the comments everyone. Since my expertise is in marketing and design, it made sense for me to look at their campaign from that perspective and in relation to how they’ll market to the every day voter and in particular my demographic.

    Ok Spinks, so we’re 2 on 1 for b-ball. If Scott’s still recovering from injury, we’ll have the advantage;) oh btw Scott I read about your illustrious injury, watched the video, that’s quite the fall you must have had.

  6. Comment by Lisa R | 2006/08/21 at 23:04:41

    By the way, I emailed the NB Women’s Liberal Association today to try and find out stats related to the number of female voters in the last election and to if any and what degree do they market to woman. I haven’t heard back yet. I thought that since they were specifically women related, they may have the info. I tried to find the equivalent organisation with the PC’s but didn’t find it with a quick seach. Maybe if I contacted the advisory council on the status of women.

  7. Comment by Scott | 2006/08/22 at 00:43:27

    just got back from the “Chi. I see this post is doing well in the comments department. lol btw spinks and lisa, I tought that i would tie one arm behind my back to make it even, but since I can’t move either, I guess I’ll havre to kick and head it in like Steve Nash. hee hee

  8. Comment by autismrealitynb | 2006/08/25 at 05:58:19

    Hi Lisa

    Your comments on the campaign ads and websites are interesting. Personally I found there was nothing much to the PC website although maybe there will be updates soon. I also find the PC approach curious. Referring to the PC party as Team Lord is almost self defeating. That is not meant as a slam on Lord. The Team Lord label, in my humble opinion, promotes the team leader but diminishes the other team members each of whom has to be elected in his/her riding. The Montreal Canadiens would never have been referred to as Team Beliveau or Team Lafleur.

    Thanks for linking my Facing Autism in New Brunswick blog site. I will link yours also (once I figure out how to do it).

    autismrealitynb

  9. Comment by Atlantic Blogger | 2006/08/26 at 12:19:34

    We like your site and made reference to it in our most recent post.

    http://atlanticblogger.com/archives/47


Leave a Reply »»