Making Choices

I’ve been realizing something lately about voting and elections. I’ve been reading the real nb election blogs as I certainly don’t consider myself one. And those people, like Spinks, Sara G, Scott, PoliticsNB and the others, they know politics. They know about the issues, about the particular agenda’s, etc. I don’t. I don’t know the issues other than what I see or hear in the media. It’s not that I don’t care about the issues, I do, a great deal actually. But I’ve never really bothered to learn the specifics before. Instead for some ridiculous reason, I thought that listening to the news and reading the newspaper would be enough. But I’m realizing that the realities of someone who only has those perceptions is very different from someone who actually knows or follows politics. I know I’m not alone as I’ve been asking many of my friends lately and they, like myself, are limited to the same scope, good for general Tim Horton’s discussions, but not the nitty gritty. We’re all educated, we all have thoughtful items to contribute to many subjects, but politics seems to be something on the peripheral and this appears to be common with woman as well as men (although more so with women). I read in the paper today that many NB university students weren’t interested in voting and I remember not voting either when I was younger. When I grew up, my parents didn’t tell each other who they voted for and it wasn’t something typically discussed. Maybe I lost my political bug when I ran for class president in grade 5 and lost to Kenny H. because he offered free pizza and longer recesses to the students, while I naively thought that interesting reading material and subject matter would be of interest, lol.

So when it comes to making that choice on election day, my decision is based on media soundbites and general impressions. Is that wise? I doubt it. By just saying “I’m left winged” therefore I’m voting NDP or Liberal, without looking at the actual issues, is that wise? I doubt it. I read the other elections blogs and I find myself agreeing with some conservative issues and on other items I agree with liberal issues. It’s actually been interesting reading blogs about the election, I certainly read the US blogs about their election last year, but this is new to me with regards to the NB election. It has created a whole new outlet for me to obtain input for the election. And I certainly feel I have more knowledge this time around than the last election. Maybe blogging will become a rich source to reach out to the everday voter like myself. I know I’d be more likely to read a blog throughout the year than watch CPAC. Not to mention, I wouldn’t have to observe the temper tantrums that seem to erupt in the legislature;)

So from the start of this process, I’ve said I’m the everyday voter, not a political pundit, not one to follow politics typically. I’ll be glad when the parties release their platforms as I’m hoping that will make it easier to isolate issues. Although as one person I spoke with today said, in many ways,

It’s a crap shoot. They all promise the moon, yet no matter who is in, they all partially fail to deliver and they all screw up over something. I may as well go eeny, meeny, miney mo.

I hope it doesn’t come down to that. Voter apathy at its best.

 

4 Responses to Making Choices »»


Comments

  1. Comment by Spinks | 2006/09/01 at 20:59:49

    I don’t think you have voter apathy Lisa. If you did, you wouldn’t be out searching, at least trying to find answers.
    BTW, if you’re looking for answers from me, PNB and Scott, maybe you are in trouble. LOL.

  2. Comment by Scott | 2006/09/01 at 22:06:50

    I seccond that Sinks!! LOL Btw, thx for reminding me to brush my teeth, I don’t know what I would have done without that advice. See Lisa, can you trust a bunch of duds like us? :)

    Seriously though, it is great to have you on board, and I’m sure Spinks can second that as well, as you are very intelligent and have a keen eye for marketing trends and strategy as related to politics. Which, btw, is essentially all an election is. Is it not? As for the issues, we all learn on the fly as it is about what you can take in and research and not about what you know? Even Spinksy baby would tell you that. Like he had any knowledge two weeks ago that he would be on a CBC chase to hand Poitras his ass. Isn’t that right Michael Noones ? hee hee

    Anyway, keep up the posts as I don’t know what I would do without my Lisa fix. But try not to blog if you have to give up sleep. Now who giving advice, eh Spinks? LOL

  3. Comment by Andrea | 2006/09/02 at 14:37:23

    As far as issues, I’ve mostly seen them as being ones that the campaigns are telling us are the issues.

  4. Comment by Brian | 2006/09/05 at 10:14:28

    Hi Lisa.
    Interesting comments about the election and sound bites. I think you make a very valid comment that not enough of us know the nitty gritty of the election issues and we do rely upon the press to make sure that we are provided with the details that we need. The unfortunate thing about this is that the press can only devote seconds to an issue, or just a very few column inches, and even then the level of reporting is spotty. So the politicians have to develop policy that can be relayed in headlines only, such as Bernard Lords “5 in 5 initiative”. The other unfortunate part is that the general public (including yes me too!) get bored too quickly by details.
    We all have our pet initiatives that we know or follow the details on. Mine happens to be insurance; one of yours is enviroment; etc. And we know how good or bad each party is handling this particular subject and how poorly the press is reporting it. Yet overall we trust the information that the press provides on other subjects, and make our decisions based on these sound bites.
    What is the answer? I am not sure if there is one. Many people go much deeper into the issues then the general public, but often times these people are driven by single issues only or have hidden agendas, or are strict party supporters regardless of the position. As a result you never know who to trust when gathering information. The NB papers I think are relatively fair, but relatively conservative leaning. CBC radio (one of my larger sources of information) is very left leaning for sure.
    For me the bottom line is that I will vote based on two items; 1) each parties stance on insurance (my pet issue) and 2) my opinions of the leaders.
    As you have stated in the past, its a two party race. I don’t like the liberals stance on insurance (there is no need for the government to enter this field) and I dont feel that Shawn Graham has what it takes to govern this province.
    I guess that gives away my vote doesnt it? But the main thing is that I WILL be voting, and I will encourange everyone I know to vote as well, even if they dont agree with my opinions.
    this is too long of a comment me thinks…. perhaps I need to start blogging too!


Leave a Reply »»